Cooking for adventure 23 June 2006
Posted by Zach in recipes, visuals.add a comment
Sorry I’ve been away this month; I spent a good bit of June traveling and lately I’ve been trying to find a job.
I’m off to a retreat for the weekend in a few minutes. I’m the cook, and what’s on the menu includes:
- General Tao’s Tofu
- A veganized version of my mom’s Better Homes and Garden’s French Breakfast Puffs
- Vegan Chunky Monkey, which I’m a bit anxious about attempting, by adding chocolate and walnuts to a veganized version of Alton Brown’s Banana Ice Cream
When I get back I’ll probably post the latter two veganized recipes on the wiki, and get back to working on anti-HLS campaign pages and sidebar.
Also, I’m working on a new skin for the site. The “new” one I made a few months ago was I think an improvement, but it is a little crazy, and the one I’m working on now stays a lot closer to the standard MonoBook/Wikimedia skin. When it’s done I’ll put screen shots on a page and whoever wants to can vote on it (that vs. the current vs. the standard Monobook skin).
Spam and anti-spam; good HLS news 28 May 2006
Posted by Zach in HLS/LSRI, activism, prisoners, spam.add a comment
I just got back from a required expedition in the Adirondacks for my last college credit… it will be nice not to jump through any more hoops (aside from work, which is better IMHO because it's confined to 8 hours a day).
So, spam: since the hosting switch, we've been able to implement the anti-spam tactic suggested by an anonymous editor (setting $wgSpamRegex to in LocalSettings.php), plus implement two other anti-spam measures (as of this evening):
- Blocking edits from open proxies, which it seems the spammers are using
- Re-installing the SpamBlacklist extension, which we lost when we migrated hosts.
I have a feeling #1 will take care of a lot of the spam we're seeing right now. It's a little unwiki (see the discussion on the page linked above), but I think we should at least try it for a few months.
<h2>HLS dropped from Pink Sheets</h2>
So [[Huntingdon Life Sciences]], aka HLS aka Life Sciences Research Inc. (their new name) aka LSRI, was recently dropped from the Pink Sheets (a third-tier stock exchange), after a few months on the Over The Counter Bulletin Board (a second-tier one), and about seven months after not being listed on the NYSE. This is a pretty huge victory for the anti-HLS campaign; I have a feeling that if we don't screw this up somehow and if they don't pull something amazing out of their hats, we could see HLS go out of business within a year or two.
In other good news, vegan prisoner [[Eric McDavid]] is being given decent vegan meals, after a very long a debilitating hunger strike and 100 days in jail.
Hosting switch, hosting co-op 13 May 2006
Posted by Zach in Uncategorized.add a comment
As the site front page explains, we recently switched hosts, from wikidev.net to hcoop.net, largely thanks to the initiative and expertise of NTK. There are a number of very positive effects that this switch will or should have:
- Cost: it should now cost only 5 bucks a month or so to host instead of about 15.
- Democracy: if you've seen [[wikiveg constitution]] you may know (and may have been justifiably upset about) my unwiki desire to keep a certain amount of monarchical control over the site. A big part of this has been that I haven't been able to bring myself to turn the site over to community control when I've been coughing up 45 bucks every three months to pay for the damn thing – it's not a ton of money, but it has sure felt like a lot to this poor student. But I feel a lot more comfortable having it be community controlled now, even if no one is chipping in yet.
- Greater control: until now we've had to ask our host Gabriel at wikidev.net to do most things for us, which takes time and sometimes extra money. But hcoop.net is geared towards the power-user, so we can do anything to the site we want ourselves (assuming we know how to do it).
- "Ethical purchasing": We're supporting what appears to be a really great and unique project.
There are a few downsides, though I think the above outweigh them:
- We lost a few edits on the switch, because when NTK and I were doing it, it was much easier to user an older installation that we had done a week or so before as a test than to start a new one, and since we were (and I still am!) in the middle of final exams and other final schoolwork, we went for the quicker option. (And we had to get it done then, since the wikidev.net hosting that had been paid for was going to run out the next week.) I don't think we lost many (any?) substantial edits, and if we did it shouldn't be hard to redo them.
- We lost the images, until I have time to re-upload them, which won't be until late May, because…
I'm heading to the Adirondacks on Monday for a wilderness expedition that I have to do to satisfy my final graduation requirement. I'm looking forward to it actually, despite the fact that we won't be able to use shampoo or deodorant for two weeks (though I'm going to see if I can smuggle in some of the latter). See ya'll in June..
Bad medicine in New Jersey 25 February 2006
Posted by Zach in SHAC, legal.1 comment so far
I went down to Trenton Wednesday night to observe the SHAC 7 trial, as I said I might. We saw the defense lawyers’ entire case Thursday, and Friday was reserved for some finagling between the lawyers about the documents that will be given to the jury later. Closing statements are happening Monday, and jury deliberations shortly after.
It ain’t over till it’s over, but I’m afraid it may not go well for them. I talked to Josh Harper (one of the defendants) after the defense ended, and he indicated they weren’t very optimistic. He called it “mind-numbing” that he very well may be going to jail over some emails and speeches, and even more mind-numbing that there are laws on the books making that possible.
I think the big problem was that the defense lawyers weren’t doing so hot. (”Sleeping on the job” is how one defendant described it.) Most of them seemed competent, but it just seems not quite right, not quite right at all, for the prosecution to take ten days making its case, and the defense lawyers to be finished all in one day. I mean, they originally thought the case would last 12-18 weeks; then six weeks; this is just three and a half!
I’m guessing the problem is that all but one of the attorneys are court-assigned and don’t have a lot of time to devote to the case, or deep interest in it. The money people have raised for the legal fund has, I believe, gone to the remaining attorney, whose name I forget. Perhaps we just didn’t raise enough to get him to really invest himself in the case?
Another big problem was that the judge, Anne Thompson, was gagging everyone from talking about what can happen to animals inside HLS. People would start to refer to “the video of the workers punching—”, for example, and get cut off by her or prosecutor Charles McKenna. I think her official reason was that it’s just “hearsay”; the footage, for example, “could be from anywhere”. I think there must be more to it than that though: one witness, Janine Motta of the New Jersey Animal Rights Alliance, started to say, “There’s this one test that they do, where they—” before she was cut off by the judge. But she wasn’t talking about HLS, or even implying that the procedure happens or could happen at HLS; she was just answering a question about what information made her become an animal rights activist. I don’t think it’s uncharitable to suggest that the judge probably just didn’t want to allow anything graphic enough to make people ashamed of how our society treats animals.
If they get some prison time, and only Darius is expecting not to I believe, Josh said an appeals process might exonerate some of them, especially Jake Conroy and Lauren Gazzola; hopefully we can raise enough funds to make that happen. But in the meantime they’d be in custody for at least a year or so. And I heard the max figure for one of the defendants is 23 years; hopefully that’s wrong and the news article that said 13 years is right.
A tiny silver lining: the mainstream news articles, I think, making them look good and HLS and the government bad for a change.
(Note: I wrote this Friday but it didn’t post for some reason. There’s also been an official update since then; they still want people to come to court Monday and Tuesday.)
Going to Trenton in my heart 22 February 2006
Posted by Zach in SHAC, legal, regional, support.add a comment
The SHAC 7 are specifically requesting supporters to come to court for these last three weekdays this week, since the prosecution finished yesterday, and the defense’s case starts today (Wednesday). From the request from defendant Andy Stepanian:
The government’s case is expected to rest this Tuesday, and it is at that point that we will be putting on our defense. We have been restrianed from showing footage of the documented crimes commited by HLS, we have been prohibited from allowing expert testimony on how vivisection is both morally and scientifically fraudulent, and we have been prohibited form mentioning the recent charges brought against HLS by the NJSPCA (see http://www.animaldefense.info/news/010506.html) We must show that we have support from the community!, we must show that we are not only innocent but we are right!, YOU CAN HELP US DO THAT! For the animals inside HLS, and for the the freedom of myself and my co-defendants please tell everyone you know to PUT ON YOUR BEST CLOTHES AND BIGGEST SMILES AND ATTEND COURT WEDNESDAY THROUGH FRIDAY OF THIS WEEK.
WE NEED YOUR HELP!
Your Friend,
Andy Stepanian
I just emailed the Boston ADL list to see if anyone else is going Thursday. If no one is I may still go via train and bus, but it’d be more difficult.
Herbivores galore!
In other news, I ordered an almost complete set of Herbivore magazine back issues, and they arrived today. I think they will be massively useful as info sources for wiki articles…
Boycott Newbury Comics; SHAC update 18 February 2006
Posted by Zach in SHAC, activism, boycotts, fur, regional.1 comment so far
I’ve seen my share of graphic footage of animal abuse, but holy shit, I couldn’t finish watching this video, from a 2004-2005 undercover investigation of Chinese fur farms.
If you don’t want to or can’t watch it, let me give you the highlights: workers killing or stunning animals by repeatedly slamming their heads on the ground by their hind legs, workers skinning animals alive, skinless animals still alive and moving, animals going berserk in cages as they see what’s going to happen to them.
Apparently, about half of the finished fur sold worldwide comes from China, because animal regulations there are virtually non-existent and labor is so cheap. So this is kind of like a major problem. You can read more about it (and send a letter to someone) on this page by the HSUS, or this less detailed Peta page.
What Newbury has to do with it
I heard about this, albeit in less graphic detail, this past Monday at a meeting of the Boston Animal Defense League (BADL). BADL is organizing a boycott of Newbury Comics, a popular New England music retailer, because they have refused, after months of polite requests, to stop selling novelty items made with Chinese-farmed rabbit fur in their stores. They’re a smallish operation (26 stores, all in New England), so I imagine the boycott will be successful.
That link goes to a wikiveg page I just made, which contains info on getting more involved if you like. You can also get more info on the boycott’s homepage, myspace.com/boycottnewburycomics.
Second week of SHAC 7
The SHAC 7 site, which for a while hadn’t been updated, has been modestly redesigned and is now being updated. Yesterday this report on the second week of the trial was post:
The second week of the SHAC 7 trial has come to a close, with the prosecution nearing the end of its case. It is expected that the prosecution will rest on Tuesday afternoon.
The week saw employees from a variety of companies related to HLS testify about home demonstrations and direct action targeted at their companies and residences. Their testimony contained one common thread: they could not identify any of the defendants as having directly been in contact with them. A slew of FBI agents, officers, and others also took the stand to testify about the information seized from the defendant’s homes during raids. One computer expert that the government spent nearly $200,000 just on analyzing the defendants’ computers. Talk about money well spent!
Thus far, the jury has only heard one side of the story—the way the government would like to present it. Next week, the defendants will finally have a chance to have their voices heard.
